“A middle-class urban planner sees a working-class neighborhood and says, 'I wouldn’t want to live there. That neighborhood must be blighted.' So the planner convinces the city to spend hundreds of millions of dollars revitalizing the neighborhood: clearing older buildings and replacing them with new high-density, mixed-use developments that the middle-class urban planner wouldn’t want to live in but thinks others should enjoy, often tying such neighborhoods together with a billion-dollar rail line.”
When is the last time that you saw that
happen in Lexington?
You might say it was the Newtown Pike
extension, now known as Oliver Lewis Way., which is currently
grinding its way through Davistown Bottoms and aiming at the
University campus area. I think that even that is wrong.
The quote above is from the Antiplanner, a blog by Randall O'Toole, looking to lay the
blame for all gentrifying neighborhoods at the feet of urban planners
– government urban planners. It is just these liberal
government lackeys who are removing vast blocks of work-a-day
resident's housing and replacing it with an unaffordable something.
Here in Lexington many of the
developments which I see as displacing large blocks of blue collar
families and gentrifying an area have not come from any government
report or plan. The most recent government-led one which I can
recall is the construction of Rupp Arena and its adjacent parking
lots, nearly 40 years ago.
One current area, for which planning is
ongoing, is the Distillery District and its associated TIF boundary.
Within this boundary are more than a few residential units, from
which the present occupants will be displaced should this project
come to fruition. Since it is a portion of the increased tax base
which will pay for infrastructure requested to make this project
work, affordable housing for the present residents will be hard to
come by.
The Distillery District idea did not
spring from any government bureaucrat or official's pen, yet it has
won favor from the legislative body and city planners are working to
help make it happen.
Another instance of a gentrifying a
neighborhood would be the renaissance of Jefferson Street on the
north side. No one can deny the almost complete turn around of the
neighborhood and the enthusiasm for what more may come. Again, I
point out that no city funds went toward designing any of the
improvements which have come about. Assistance was given in the land
swap deal concerning BCTC getting a new campus. Private corporations
and Transylvania University are playing the largest part in removing
lower income housing here.
Will we be seeing the same thing play
out with the activity on North Limestone as small entrepreneurs
attempt to duplicate the Jefferson Street experience? I expect so,
but it will not be the “middle-class urban planner” who will be
driving the bus. That would fall to the middle-class (are there any
of them left?) city residents who will frequent the gentrifying
pioneers and thus making it “trendy.”
If we are looking for a local
boondoggle, a la the Antiplanner, we
should look no further than the up-coming TIF discussion requested by
the company proposing the development at Man o' War Blvd and
Nicholasville Rd. Called “The Summit,” they are proposing a near
Hamburg style shopping area on what planners call a “greenfield”
and asking for relief in a “blighted area,” which is the primary
use of a TIF.
Blighted
area? Really?
Am
I blind? Where are the fingerprints of middle-class government urban
planners all over these doings?
Is
Lexington out of touch or just 20 years behind like Mark Twain said?
We may have a real problem of realizing just what image we may be
projecting to the world, but it is not coming from the government's
urban planners. I can see that.
